Two basic technologies in mobile phones, CDMA and GSM
represent a gap you can't cross. They're the reason you can't use AT&T
phones on Verizon's network and vice versa. But what does CDMA vs. GSM really
mean for you?
CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) and GSM (Global System for
Mobiles) are shorthand for the two major radio systems used in cell phones.
Both acronyms tend to group together a bunch of technologies run by the same
entities. In this story, I'll try to explain who uses which technology and what
the real differences are.
Which Carries are CDMA? Which are GSM?
Five of the top seven carriers in the U.S. use CDMA: Verizon Wireless, Sprint, MetroPCS, Cricket, and U.S. Cellular. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM.
Five of the top seven carriers in the U.S. use CDMA: Verizon Wireless, Sprint, MetroPCS, Cricket, and U.S. Cellular. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM.
That means we're mostly a CDMA country. It also means we're not
part of the norm, because most of the world is GSM. The global spread of GSM
came about because in 1987, Europe mandated the technology by law, and because
GSM comes from an industry consortium. What we call CDMA, by and large, is
owned by chipmaker Qualcomm. This made it less expensive for third parties to
build GSM equipment.
There are several variants and options carriers can choose, like
toppings on their technological ice cream. In this story we'll be talking about
U.S. networks.
What CDMA vs. GSM Means to You
For call quality, the technology you use is much less important than the way your carrier has built its network. There are good and bad CDMA and GSM networks, but there are key differences between the technologies. Here's what you, as a consumer, need to know.
For call quality, the technology you use is much less important than the way your carrier has built its network. There are good and bad CDMA and GSM networks, but there are key differences between the technologies. Here's what you, as a consumer, need to know.
It's much easier to swap phones on GSM networks, because GSM
carriers put customer information on a removable SIM card. Take the card out,
put it in a different phone, and the new phone now has your number. What's
more, to be considered GSM, a carrier must accept any GSM-compliant phone. So
the GSM carriers don't have total control of the phone you're using.
That's not the case with CDMA. In the U.S., CDMA carriers use
network-based white lists to verify their subscribers. That means you can only
switch phones with your carrier's permission, and a carrier doesn't have to
accept any particular phone onto its network. It could, but typically, U.S.
carriers choose not to.
In other words, you can take an unlocked AT&T phone over to
T-Mobile (although its 3G may not work well because the frequency bands are
different). You can't take a Verizon phone over to Sprint, because Sprint's
network rejects non-Sprint phones.
3G CDMA networks (known as "EV-DO" or "Evolution
Data Optimized") also, generally, can't make voice calls and transmit data
at the same time. Once more, that's an available option (known as "SV-DO"
for "Simultaneous Voice and Data Optimization"), but one that U.S.
carriers haven't adopted for their networks and phones.
On the other hand, all 3G GSM networks have simultaneous
voice and data, because it's a required part of the spec. (3G GSM is also
actually a type of CDMA. I'll explain that later.)
So why did so many U.S. carriers go with CDMA? Timing. When
Verizon's predecessors and Sprint switched from analog to digital in 1995 and
1996, CDMA was the newest, hottest, fastest technology. It offered more
capacity, better call quality and more potential than the GSM of the day. GSM
caught up, but by then those carriers' paths were set.
It's possible to switch from CDMA to GSM. Two carriers in Canada
have done it, to get access to the wider variety of off-the-shelf GSM phones.
But Verizon and Sprint are big enough that they can get custom phones built for
them, so they don't see the need to waste money switching 3G technologies when
they could be building out their 4G networks.
No comments:
Post a Comment